[Home]
September 5, 2009
Personally, I don't care what outrages the Republicans. They are against everything. The Democrats need to do what's right for people -- even the dumb ass Republicans.
|
||
August 27, 2009
I have a question and a statement about health care in the United States:
|
||
August 19, 2009
This is how you deal with crazy people. At a recent town hall meeting, Senator Barney Frank responded to a question as to why he is supporting Obama's "Nazi policy" about health care. His response: This is the only way to deal with people who will accept no answers that make sense. See the video here. It's worth the few minutes it takes to watch it. John L. Ferri
|
||
July 9, 2009
If someone believes that homeopathy is a valid treatment for anything (except possibly as a placebo), then no amount of logic or sense on your part will convince them otherwise. So don't argue. Make fun of them. See this clip. Did an airline lose your luggage, or break something of yours? And they admited it was their fault. And they still won't pay. See this clip. Click here for the full story. This guy is my hero. JLF |
||
July 4, 2009
Breaking news - Michael Jackson is still dead, but the media are obsessed with covering him, rather than Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, health care reform, the climate, etc., etc, etc. The main stream media sucks. More breaking news - Sarah Palin announces that she will resign as governor of Alaska. The media, who is still covering the death of Michael Jackson, should be looking for the reason why, but they're not. Even more breaking news - Sarah Palin is still a moron. Lesson for the week -- if you want media coverage, don't die a few days before Michael Jackson. Remember Ed McMahon, Farah Fawcett, and Billy Mays! JLF |
||
April 21, 2009 The recently released torture memos show that CIA agents waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 183 times in attempts to get information. I can imagine what went on there. CIA agent #1: Did he talk? CIA agent #2: No, he just screamed in agony and vomited and coughed up water. CIA agent #1: Great. Do it again. [later] CIA agent #1: Did he talk? CIA agent #2: No, he just screamed in agony and vomited and coughed up water. CIA agent #1: Great. Do it again. [later] CIA agent #1: Did he talk? CIA agent #2: No, he just screamed in agony and vomited and coughed up water. CIA agent #1: Great. Do it again. [later] CIA agent #1: Did he talk? CIA agent #2: No, he just screamed in agony and vomited and coughed up water. CIA agent #1: Great. Do it again. [later] CIA agent #1: Did he talk? CIA agent #2: No, he just screamed in agony and vomited and coughed up water. CIA agent #1: Great. Do it again. [later] CIA agent #1: Did he talk? CIA agent #2: No, he just screamed in agony and vomited and coughed up water. CIA agent #1: Great. Do it again. And they repeated this 176 more times. Are these guys who are supposed to be protecting our country idiots? Is this any different than the current crop of conservatives Republicans? Conservative Republican #1: The rich aren't getting richer fast enough. Let's cut their taxes and screw the middle class and the poor. Conservative Republican #2: Did it work? Conservative Republican #1: Yes, the rich are getting fabulously wealthy, the middle class and the poor are in serious trouble, but the government is going broke. Conservative Republican #1: Do it again. [later] Conservative Republican #1: The rich aren't getting richer fast enough. Let's cut their taxes and screw the middle class and the poor. Conservative Republican #2: Did it work? Conservative Republican #1: Yes, the rich are getting fabulously wealthy, the middle class and the poor are in serious trouble, but the government is going broke. Conservative Republican #1: Do it again. Repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat, etc etc etc .... I think this is what is commonly called insanity. John L. Ferri
|
||
April 16, 2009 Paul Krugman's recent Op-Ed in the NY Times (Tea Parties Forever, 4/13/09) has finally explained everything you need to know about the Republican party -- they're crazy; they've been crazy for the last 15 years; and they will continue to be crazy as long as gullible crazy people support them.
How else would you explain the following: 1 - apologizing to Rush "the drug abusing hypocrite" Limbaugh. Conclusion: Republicans are crazy. John L. Ferri
|
||
March 28, 2009 Even though my home town is small with a population of a little over 3000, it's still large enough to be "blessed" with more religious institutions than bars. I don't mind the bars -- at least they pay property taxes. One of these religious institutions is the Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses. I used to be able to identify them -- usually 2 men, one much younger than the other, dressed like the Blues Brothers -- as they walked the streets spreading the word trying to recruit new blood. However, the other day, my doorbell rang and two people -- a middle aged male with a middle aged female -- were there. They were very polite, identified themselves, and gave me a pamphlet about Easter. I took the pamphlet, thanked them, and they left. They looked normal, dressed normal, and acted normal. I guess that the Jehovah's Witnesses must have changed their business model so they can now sneak up on you. It's time for me to get a sign for my front door -- "The Hell with the Dog -- Beware of the Atheist." John L. Ferri
|
||
March 14, 2009 Stewart vs Cramer If you haven't heard of the interview of CNBC's Jim Cramer by Comedy Central's Jon Stewart, you need to get out from under that rock. Brilliant journalism by what other so-called journalists should be doing. The best part, though, was when Stewart referred to Joe Scarborough as "Doucheborough" -- which is probably only on the unedited version. John L. Ferri
|
||
March 12, 2009 During a March 9, 2009 interview, David Shuster of MSNBC's 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue asked Paul Krugman about John Boehner's suggestion of a government spending freeze as a corrective measure for the current economic situation. Krugman's reply:
The above reply is 4:55 min. into the linked interview. John L. Ferri
|
||
March 11, 2009 Yesterday, on the Science Daily website:
Finally, an explanation of why Rush Limbaugh,---who is full of, and produces copious quantities of, hot air---needed to illegally consume oxycodone and hydrocodone. John L. Ferri
|
||
February 24, 2009
As noted by NY Times columnist Bob Herbert, in the first paragraph of the prologue of "Bold Endeavors: How Our Government Built America, and Why It Must Rebuild Now," the author, Felix Rohatyn, writes, "The nation is falling apart -- literally." He continues that the entire infrastructure of the U.S.A. is "rapidly and dangerously deteriorating," and estimates that it will require $11 billion annually just to repair our aging drinking water facilities, with an estimated additional $1.6 trillion over the next 5 years to upgrade other critical system to be "dependable and safe." Just to be clear, $1.6 trillion is $1,600 billion, or $1,600,000 million, or $1,600,000,000,000. That's a lot of money. And how do the Republicans propose we pay for it? With tax cuts, of course. When your household requires additional funds for housing or car repairs, medical expenses or insurance, or some other luxury like food, the Republican philosophy dictates that you contact your employer and demand a pay cut. It's the only reasonable thing to do. Now take a deep breath and let's get back to the real world. Our government's income comes from taxes. The middle class have always paid their fair share, and those with much higher incomes used to pay their fair share in the past. So it seems reasonable to tax the rich as in the past so that they again pay their fair share. But why should the rich pay more taxes? Because it is in their best interest to maintain the infrastructure that enabled them to become wealthy in the first place. The current marginal federal tax rate is 35% for taxable income over $366,650. Income in lower brackets is taxed at lower rates. In the 1950s, this highest rate was 91% for income over $400,000. Adjusting this amount for inflation to 2009 dollars puts it at $3,151,000. Will the rich object to higher taxes? Of course they will. But, as I mentioned above, it is to their benefit to maintain our infrastructure because they will suffer the most if the country degrades into oblivion. The poor and middle class are already living in the beginnings of this oblivion. John L. Ferri
|
||
February 23, 2009 Republican Commandments
If you can add to the list, email me and I may add it. John Ferri
|
||
February 22, 2009 Tasty Snacks A friend of mine emailed the photo below with the comment that I inspired him after his toddler daughter had eaten a hot dog for lunch and some freezer biscuits came out of the oven dome-shaped.
.
Thanks to Kris for thinking of me.
|
||
February 12, 2009 Analog to Digital, But Still Crap Even though congress decided to delay until June 2009 the switch from analog to digital broadcasting for U.S. television stations, approximately 60% of stations are ready now, have been ready, and will switch on the original date of February 17, 2009. This will provide better reception, more bandwidth for other purposes, and a reason for a lot of people to buy new television sets. What it won't provide is better programming. Crap with a better picture is still crap. It
is impossible to supply anything resembling quality programming for
hundreds of channels that are on 24 hours each day. The airwaves need to
be filled, and as long as the polls report that someone is watching, the
airwaves will be filled -- which is why we have I remember when there were only three channels, and at somewhere around midnight after the National Anthem, a test pattern was shown until early in the morning. What was broadcast may not have been top quality, but it was better than 95% of what we have available now. Less crap is better than more crap. Television has---or had---such great potential as an educational tool. Not that entertainment isn't needed at times. But most of what is supplied is propaganda in the form of advertising and what is passed off as news. As for the analog to digital conversion, I hope that when the switch is made, something shorts out and the entire broadcast system is destroyed. That will leave us with the internet, books, and each other. We'll survive just fine.
John L. Ferri
|
||
February 11, 2009 Cut Taxes, Rinse, Repeat, ... According to a report Economic Stimulus: Issues and Policies issued on 1/23/2009 by the Congressional Research Service:
In a table on page 13, the report lists 2 types of policy proposals -- tax provisions and spending provisions -- and gives their estimate of the "One-year change in real GDP for a given policy change per dollar," as shown below:
Yet, the Republicans -- even the centrists -- still keep clamoring for tax cuts. Here is what any sane person would make of the current Republican platform, borrowed from Bill in Portland Maine on DailyKos:
It's tough to negotiate with another group when they are insane. Yup, cut taxes, rinse, repeat.
John L. Ferri
|
|
|
February 10, 2009 They're
back -- indulgences, that is. In
recent months, Catholic dioceses around the world have reintroduced the
concept of indulgences. Even earlier, in 2000, Pope John Paul II
authorized his bishops to begin offering them again. Indulgences were
decoupled, along with meatless Fridays and the Latin Mass, from mainstream
Catholicism by The Second Vatican Council in 1960. Indulgences
allow an absolved sinner to reduce punishment time in Purgatory, and are
accumulated through certain prayers, pilgrimages, or devotions.
Officially, they cannot be purchased. There are partial and plenary
indulgences, and the Vatican Manual of Indulgences to guide one through the intricacies of this complicated topic. Rev.
Tom Reese, a Jesuit and former editor of the Catholic magazine America,
said, "The good news is we're not selling them anymore," which
means that at one time they did. Bishop Nicholas A. DiMarzio of Brooklyn
said that the reason indulgences are being reintroduced is "Because
there is sin in the world." Somehow,
someway, indulgences will become profitable for the church. Why? Because
they desperately need the money because of reparations for all of those
child sexual abuse cases that were finally resolved. There are probably a
lot of priests hustling for their share of those indulgences. But
don't worry. At least this atheist isn't, because everything that any
religion tells you is all made up. The Bible -- all made up. Koran -- pure
bull. Book of Mormon -- so much bullshit that it almost makes the Bible
seem reasonable. Scientology -- this make the Mormons look like geniuses. Worried about sin. No problem. I'll forgive you for the paltry sum of $10 (U.S.) sent to my Pay-Pal account at emcw@epix.net. Note that I am an ordained minister, and that I absolutely guarantee that for $10 your immortal soul (or essence, or spirit, or mojo) will go directly to heaven when you die. If you can prove otherwise, I'll refund your money and add another $1,000,000 just for the hell of it. John L. Ferri
|
||
February 10, 2009 This blog is now officially open. I'll be adding to it when the urge hits. The newest items will be at the top. Send comments to jlferri@epix.net. I may use your comments online, so please be civil. John L. Ferri |
||
All contents copyright © John L. Ferri jlferri@epix.net All rights reserved. Endless Mountains Computer Works, http://home.epix.net/~jlferri/blog.html |