THE GRIM EXPLORATION
In art, the vast space of that which
is previous, and all that will be realized adheres itself to the demi-collective
of a creator's being. In this sense, indeed, in this age, the effort
to achieve a statement of expression becomes a dialectic of the cycles
between life and death. The great beasts tattooed on the myriad of cave
walls across the globe attest to this fact. The spires of cathedrals,
the Modernist literature of the early 20th century, and the working
and re-working of Cubist theories, all share the conscious or subconscious
human need to record a life and somehow, through art transcend death.
Of course, at its apex, an object of creation re-defines immortality;
the art itself becoming a vessel of trascendence along the continuum
of reference.
For some artists, death, itself, becomes
the muse, or, if you will, an abstract hypothesis of form. Today, on
the cusp of a millennium pre-recorded by our literature and cinema,
the artist entwines hiw will and being to the benefits received from
the bounty of history. Just as the early Pop artist drenched his expression
in the oil of commercialism and irony, today with the backdrop of urban
and suburban violence flickering in front of us, a genre develops based
on the most basic tenors of death: an exploration not of philosophical
meandering, but a display and acquiescence to a social hunger for the
new macabre.
England's Damien Hirst immediately comes
to my mind, with his organic or biological installations. Hirst's work
is a cartoon of all things artistic and modern, a hieroglyph of an age
where the food on your plate is liable for protest and a life is the
cost of what you have inyour pockets. The ratioinale for this art is
irony; now, as much a tool, or medium, as oil, clay or a typewriter.
From Duchamp through to Warhol's extremes, the last two generations
of mature artists have confronted the gem of irony and its grim recognition
with a halting enthusiasm. Indeed, Lichtenstein's irrelevancies constitute
for many a logo of art from 60's and 70's. We've been allowed to caricature
our motives and structures, but at what price? Even in the art world,
there seems little respect for the gristle of art, the sinewy struggle
to create. Silence could simply be a conceptual installation of personality
crisis on display. The walls of the galleries left bare as statement.
Nietzsche wrote that, "the habit of irony, like of sarcasm, spoils
the character; it gradually fosters the quality of a malicious superiority:
one finally grows like a snappy dog, that has learned to laugh as well
as to bite."
Death and degeneration have voiced more
profound and lyrical works of art, however, the grace of Carson McCullers'
body of work follows her fascination with the grotesque, as did the
art of Poe before her. The great French Symbolists ran a course of beauty
over a map of mortality and deprivation. The sculpture of the contemporary
American artist, Christina Bothwell, inhabits the same shadowy glade
as her predecessors. Her charred images of ghost-like children and the
imaged lineage of her installation illustrates the possibilities of
our era and its violent fetish with mortality.
To an artist, life and death loom over
a more strident field, the necessities of existence become, at times,
the obstacles that denied Hart Crane and Mark Rothko further greatness,
taken as they were by the hand of destined suicide. Suffice to say:
that the intensity of a creative life inspires an amplified dread as
well as a more rigorous affair with the day to day. Even in our world
of faceless technologies and derivative forms, the artists looks into
the cave of death and the flower of life with a smirk carved from sheer
will; an explorer of the fathomless and unending.
Mark Zimmerman
|